IMPLEMENTING PROTOCOL-BASED THERAPY OF CONTINUOUS NEUROMUSCULAR BLOCKADE PROVIDES COST MINIMIZATION
Robert MacLaren, L Kent Toombs, Johanna M Plamondon, Graeme M Rocker, Ward D Patrick, and Richard I Hall

OBJECTIVE: To compare empiric and protocol-based therapies of neuromuscular blockade in terms of cost and control of paralysis.

METHODS: Data were prospectively collected for nine months before and five months after a protocol was implemented in the 24-bed medical/surgical/neurologic intensive care unit as a physician-initiated, double-sided medication order form. Pancuronium was the preferred agent and vecuronium was an alternative for patients with renal dysfunction, hepatic dysfunction, or hemodynamic instability.

RESULTS: Twenty-nine empiric-therapy patients and 17 protocol-based therapy patients were comparatively evaluated. Length of stay in the intensive care unit and duration of neuromuscular blockade were similar between groups. Protocol adherence rate was 76.5%. Protocol-based therapy increased the hourly dose of pancuronium (0.29 ± 0.37 mg vs. 0.02 ± 0.10 mg; p < 0.005) and reduced the mean hourly cost of neuromuscular blockade compared with empiric therapy ($5.11 ± 4.76 Canadian [CDN] vs. $9.03 ± 7.03 CDN; p < 0.05). Vecuronium use did not change, but rocuronium and atracurium were not given after protocol implementation. The proportion of recorded train-of-four measurements representing adequate neuromuscular blockade increased (52.3% vs. 32.7%; p < 0.05) with protocol-based therapy.

CONCLUSIONS: Compliance with a neuromuscular blocking protocol reduces drug costs and improves control of neuromuscular blockade.

J Pharm Technol 2001;17:49-55.